Electricity Rates by State 2026: Complete Comparison
Most homeowners know roughly what they pay per month — but almost nobody knows their actual rate per kilowatt-hour. That number, which ranges from 10.92¢ in North Dakota to 39.89¢ in Hawaii, determines the financial case for solar, the value of efficiency upgrades, and whether time-of-use rate plans will save or cost you money. Here is the full picture for 2026.
Key Takeaways
- →The national average residential electricity rate hit 18.05¢/kWh in early 2026 — up 5.4% year-over-year, per EIA data.
- →Hawaii (39.89¢) is 3.7× more expensive than North Dakota (10.92¢) — the widest spread since EIA records began.
- →The Northeast region averages 42% above the national average; South Central states average 22% below it.
- →Your electricity rate — not system size — is the primary driver of solar payback period; a 10¢ rate difference adds 7–10 years to payback.
- →US rates have risen 31.6% since 2020; EIA projects continued increases through at least 2027.
The Rate You Think You Pay vs. What You Actually Pay
Here is something that surprises most homeowners: your stated electricity rate and your effective rate are almost never the same number. Utilities advertise a base energy charge — say, 14¢/kWh in Georgia or 11¢/kWh in Arkansas — but that figure ignores fixed monthly customer charges ($8–$25), fuel cost adjustments, transmission and distribution riders, and state and local taxes. When you add these up and divide by your actual kWh consumed, most households pay 20–35% more per kWh than the published rate.
The correct way to calculate your effective rate: take your total monthly bill in dollars and divide by total kWh consumed, both shown on your bill. If you paid $187 for 1,050 kWh, your effective rate is 17.81¢/kWh — regardless of what your utility advertises. This is the number that matters for solar calculations, efficiency upgrade ROI, and EV charging cost analysis. The state averages in this article use EIA's Electric Power Monthly data, which captures total revenue divided by total sales and therefore reflects these all-in effective rates.
According to EIA's 2022 Residential Energy Consumption Survey (RECS), the average U.S. household consumes 10,791 kWh per year. At the 2026 national average of 18.05¢/kWh, that equals approximately $1,948 per year — $162/month. But that average masks extraordinary variation: a household in Honolulu consuming the same 10,791 kWh pays $4,304/year, while one in Fargo, North Dakota pays just $1,178/year. Same energy use. $3,126/year difference.
Use our Electricity Cost Calculator to find your actual effective rate from your latest bill and compare it to your state average below.
All 50 States: Complete Rate Table (2026)
The following rates are derived from EIA Electric Power Monthly data for residential customers, reflecting early 2026 estimates. Rates are all-in averages including energy charges, fixed customer fees, fuel adjustments, and taxes.
10 Cheapest States
| Rank | State | Rate (¢/kWh) | Annual Bill (avg use) | Primary Fuel Mix |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | North Dakota | 10.92¢ | $1,178/yr | Coal, Wind, Hydro |
| 2 | Nebraska | 11.57¢ | $1,249/yr | Nuclear, Wind, Coal |
| 3 | Wyoming | 11.60¢ | $1,252/yr | Coal, Wind |
| 4 | Idaho | 11.87¢ | $1,281/yr | Hydro, Wind |
| 5 | Missouri | 11.91¢ | $1,285/yr | Coal, Nuclear |
| 6 | Utah | 11.95¢ | $1,290/yr | Coal, Natural Gas |
| 7 | Oklahoma | 12.25¢ | $1,322/yr | Natural Gas, Wind, Coal |
| 8 | Washington | 12.31¢ | $1,328/yr | Hydro, Nuclear |
| 9 | Arkansas | 12.33¢ | $1,331/yr | Natural Gas, Nuclear, Hydro |
| 10 | Louisiana | 12.44¢ | $1,342/yr | Natural Gas, Nuclear |
10 Most Expensive States
| Rank | State | Rate (¢/kWh) | Annual Bill (avg use) | Why It's High |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hawaii | 39.89¢ | $4,305/yr | Petroleum imports, island grid |
| 2 | California | 34.71¢ | $3,746/yr | Wildfire hardening, RPS mandates, labor |
| 3 | Massachusetts | 31.51¢ | $3,400/yr | LNG imports, aggressive RPS, grid age |
| 4 | Rhode Island | 31.30¢ | $3,378/yr | Gas imports, small grid, high RPS |
| 5 | Maine | 29.55¢ | $3,189/yr | Aging grid, limited pipeline capacity |
| 6 | New Hampshire | 26.40¢ | $2,849/yr | Nuclear costs, limited competition |
| 7 | Alaska | 25.54¢ | $2,756/yr | Diesel generation, remote grid |
| 8 | Connecticut | 25.30¢ | $2,730/yr | High labor, gas imports, aggressive RPS |
| 9 | New York | 24.37¢ | $2,630/yr | Dense infrastructure costs, carbon programs |
| 10 | Vermont | 24.18¢ | $2,609/yr | — |
All 50 States — Alphabetical
| State | Abbr. | Rate (¢/kWh) | vs. National Avg | Region |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | AL | 16.01¢ | -11.3% | South |
| Alaska | AK | 25.54¢ | +41.5% | Pacific |
| Arizona | AZ | 15.46¢ | -14.3% | West |
| Arkansas | AR | 12.33¢ | -31.7% | South |
| California | CA | 34.71¢ | +92.3% | Pacific |
| Colorado | CO | 16.12¢ | -10.7% | Mountain |
| Connecticut | CT | 25.30¢ | +40.2% | Northeast |
| Delaware | DE | 16.58¢ | -8.1% | Mid-Atlantic |
| Florida | FL | 16.74¢ | -7.3% | South |
| Georgia | GA | 14.25¢ | -21.1% | South |
| Hawaii | HI | 39.89¢ | +121.0% | Pacific |
| Idaho | ID | 11.87¢ | -34.2% | Mountain |
| Illinois | IL | 16.93¢ | -6.2% | Midwest |
| Indiana | IN | 14.30¢ | -20.8% | Midwest |
| Iowa | IA | 13.51¢ | -25.2% | Midwest |
| Kansas | KS | 14.02¢ | -22.3% | Midwest |
| Kentucky | KY | 13.14¢ | -27.2% | South |
| Louisiana | LA | 12.44¢ | -31.1% | South |
| Maine | ME | 29.55¢ | +63.7% | Northeast |
| Maryland | MD | 18.95¢ | +5.0% | Mid-Atlantic |
| Massachusetts | MA | 31.51¢ | +74.6% | Northeast |
| Michigan | MI | 19.42¢ | +7.6% | Midwest |
| Minnesota | MN | 16.50¢ | -8.6% | Midwest |
| Mississippi | MS | 14.89¢ | -17.5% | South |
| Missouri | MO | 11.91¢ | -34.0% | Midwest |
| Montana | MT | 13.85¢ | -23.3% | Mountain |
| Nebraska | NE | 11.57¢ | -35.9% | Midwest |
| Nevada | NV | 17.75¢ | -1.7% | Mountain |
| New Hampshire | NH | 26.40¢ | +46.3% | Northeast |
| New Jersey | NJ | 22.10¢ | +22.4% | Mid-Atlantic |
| New Mexico | NM | 15.23¢ | -15.6% | Mountain |
| New York | NY | 24.37¢ | +35.0% | Mid-Atlantic |
| North Carolina | NC | 14.51¢ | -19.6% | South |
| North Dakota | ND | 10.92¢ | -39.5% | Midwest |
| Ohio | OH | 15.72¢ | -12.9% | Midwest |
| Oklahoma | OK | 12.25¢ | -32.1% | South |
| Oregon | OR | 16.20¢ | -10.2% | Pacific |
| Pennsylvania | PA | 18.22¢ | +0.9% | Mid-Atlantic |
| Rhode Island | RI | 31.30¢ | +73.4% | Northeast |
| South Carolina | SC | 15.89¢ | -12.0% | South |
| South Dakota | SD | 13.42¢ | -25.7% | Midwest |
| Tennessee | TN | 13.75¢ | -23.8% | South |
| Texas | TX | 15.38¢ | -14.8% | South |
| Utah | UT | 11.95¢ | -33.8% | Mountain |
| Vermont | VT | 24.18¢ | +34.0% | Northeast |
| Virginia | VA | 15.66¢ | -13.2% | South |
| Washington | WA | 12.31¢ | -31.8% | Pacific |
| West Virginia | WV | 13.44¢ | -25.5% | South |
| Wisconsin | WI | 18.01¢ | -0.2% | Midwest |
| Wyoming | WY | 11.60¢ | -35.7% | Mountain |
Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Electric Power Monthly, residential sector averages, early 2026 estimates. Annual bill calculation assumes 10,791 kWh/year (EIA 2022 RECS national average household consumption).
Regional Rate Patterns and Why They Exist
Electricity rates do not vary randomly — they follow clear geographic patterns driven by fuel sources, grid infrastructure, and regulatory regimes. Understanding your region explains a lot about your bill.
| Region | Avg Rate (¢/kWh) | vs. National Avg | Key Driver |
|---|---|---|---|
| New England | 28.4¢ | +57% | LNG pipeline constraints, aggressive RPS |
| Pacific (excl. Hawaii) | 21.1¢ | +17% | California wildfire costs; WA/OR low hydro rates |
| Mid-Atlantic | 19.8¢ | +10% | Dense infrastructure, offshore wind surcharges |
| Mountain | 14.6¢ | −19% | Coal/natural gas abundance, lower regulatory burden |
| South Central | 14.1¢ | −22% | Natural gas abundance, lower labor costs |
| Midwest | 15.3¢ | −15% | Coal/nuclear base, growing wind penetration |
| South Atlantic | 15.4¢ | −15% | Nuclear and gas mix, regulated utility structure |
Why New England Is So Expensive
New England's electricity crisis is a legitimate structural problem, not just regulatory excess. The region lacks adequate natural gas pipeline capacity — during winter peak demand, pipelines from Pennsylvania and the Gulf Coast run at full capacity, forcing New England utilities to import expensive liquefied natural gas (LNG) from global markets. In January 2023, ISO New England electricity prices briefly spiked to over $800/MWh (versus a normal $30–$60/MWh) because of pipeline constraints. That volatility gets smoothed into higher baseline rates that ratepayers absorb year-round.
All six New England states also have Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) requiring 30–50%+ renewable electricity by 2030, and the offshore wind projects required to meet those mandates (Cape Wind successors, Vineyard Wind, Revolution Wind) have faced significant cost escalation — Vineyard Wind's revised contracts came in at roughly $130/MWh, triple the historic rate for offshore wind. Those costs flow through to ratepayers as surcharges.
Why the Mountain West Stays Cheap
States like Wyoming, Idaho, Utah, and Montana benefit from a combination of abundant coal, significant hydroelectric capacity, and lower population density that limits grid infrastructure costs per customer. Wyoming generates more electricity than it consumes and exports power to neighboring states. Idaho's rate of 11.87¢/kWh reflects a grid that is roughly 60% hydroelectric — essentially free fuel once the dam is built. The lack of aggressive renewable portfolio standards in several Mountain West states also means utilities have avoided expensive early-stage renewable procurement costs.
The 5 Factors That Drive Your State's Rate
An electricity rate is fundamentally a cost recovery mechanism — utilities add up everything they spend, divide by kWh sold, and that's your rate. Understanding the components demystifies why some states pay 3× what others do.
1. Fuel Mix and Fuel Costs
The largest component of an electricity rate is fuel cost — what the utility pays to generate each kWh. Hydroelectric power has essentially zero fuel cost (the water is free); nuclear fuel costs roughly $0.005/kWh; natural gas fluctuates between $0.03–$0.10/kWh depending on market prices; and petroleum (used in Hawaii and some remote Alaska communities) costs $0.15–$0.25/kWh. States with abundant cheap generation — hydro in the Northwest, coal in Wyoming, nuclear in Nebraska — have structural rate advantages. States dependent on natural gas imports, like New England, face price volatility that feeds into their rates.
2. Infrastructure Age and Investment Cycle
According to the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) 2025 Infrastructure Report Card, the average age of a U.S. electricity transformer is 35 years — at or beyond its design life. Utilities in the Northeast and Midwest are in the middle of expensive grid replacement cycles, and those capital costs are reflected in rates. California's rate increases from 2018–2026 are substantially driven by wildfire prevention investments: Pacific Gas & Electric alone has spent $50+ billion on grid hardening, and regulators have allowed those costs to pass through to residential customers.
3. Regulatory Environment
In regulated monopoly states (most states), a single utility serves each geographic area and a public utility commission sets rates. In deregulated states (Texas, Illinois, Pennsylvania, New York, and others), generators compete to sell power while utilities retain the wires. The theory was competition would lower rates; in practice, results have been mixed. Texas maintains relatively low rates partly through ERCOT market competition, but also because it has abundant natural gas. Connecticut and New Jersey are deregulated but still expensive, because the underlying fuel and infrastructure costs are high regardless of market structure.
4. Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS)
Twenty-nine states plus Washington D.C. have mandatory Renewable Portfolio Standards requiring utilities to source a percentage of electricity from renewables. These mandates have generally driven down solar and wind costs over time (NREL data shows utility-scale solar costs fell from $0.35/kWh in 2010 to $0.04/kWh in 2024), but during early-stage buildout, new renewable projects often cost more than the existing fleet they replace. States with high RPS targets (California 100% by 2045, New York 70% by 2030) are paying that transition cost now.
5. Load Density and Transmission Costs
Wyoming has one of the lowest rates in the country partly because it generates far more electricity than its small population needs — the grid infrastructure cost is spread over massive generation capacity but few customers. Conversely, a rural New England utility might serve 50 customers per mile of distribution line, making per-customer infrastructure costs very high. Transmission and distribution charges typically represent 30–40% of a residential electricity rate, per EIA data, so this factor matters enormously in sparsely populated states with aging infrastructure.
How Your Rate Determines Solar ROI
Solar panels generate kWh. The financial value of those kWh depends entirely on what you would have paid the grid for them. This is why the same physical solar system produces wildly different financial outcomes in different states.
| State Example | Rate | 8 kW System Cost (net of 30% ITC) | Annual Savings | Payback Period | 25-Year Savings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Massachusetts | 31.51¢ | $19,600 | $3,150 | 6.2 yrs | $59,200 |
| California | 34.71¢ | $18,900 | $3,470 | 5.4 yrs | $67,900 |
| New York | 24.37¢ | $20,100 | $2,440 | 8.2 yrs | $40,900 |
| Texas | 15.38¢ | $17,500 | $1,540 | 11.4 yrs | $20,600 |
| Georgia | 14.25¢ | $17,200 | $1,430 | 12.0 yrs | $17,600 |
| Louisiana | 12.44¢ | $16,900 | $1,244 | 13.6 yrs | $14,200 |
Assumptions: 8 kW system, 10,000 kWh/year production (varies slightly by solar resource), 30% federal ITC applied, $2.80/W installed cost, 2.5% annual rate escalation, no net metering degradation. The federal ITC was extended through 2034 under the Inflation Reduction Act.
The solar math is unambiguous: the higher your state's electricity rate, the stronger your solar case. A Massachusetts homeowner and a Louisiana homeowner might install identical systems at similar costs, but the Massachusetts homeowner gets nearly $46,000 more in lifetime savings. For homeowners in high-rate states, solar panels are effectively a guaranteed investment with a fixed 6–8 year payback followed by 17–19 years of free electricity.
Note that net metering policies also matter — California's NEM 3.0 rule (adopted April 2023) significantly reduced export credits, cutting payback periods back to 8–10 years for many systems despite the state's high rates. Always check your utility's current net metering rules before buying. Use our Solar Savings Calculator to model your specific situation with your actual rate.
Why Rates Are Rising — And What's Coming Next
U.S. residential electricity rates have risen 31.6% from 2020 to 2025, according to EIA Electric Power Monthly historical data. This is not a short-term blip — several structural forces are pushing rates higher for the foreseeable future.
Data center demand: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory's 2024 report projects U.S. data center electricity consumption will reach 325–580 TWh by 2028, roughly doubling from 2023 levels. This new demand requires new generation capacity and transmission infrastructure, and the costs will flow through to residential rates over 5–10 years.
EV charging infrastructure: The DOE's National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI) program is funding $5 billion in EV charging corridor buildout. The associated grid upgrades are a real cost that utilities will recover from ratepayers.
Grid hardening for extreme weather: Hurricanes, wildfires, and ice storms have become more frequent and severe, and utilities are investing heavily in grid resilience. The Edison Electric Institute estimates utilities invested $145 billion in transmission and distribution infrastructure in 2024 alone.
EIA's Short-Term Energy Outlook (March 2026) projects the U.S. average residential rate will reach approximately 19.5¢/kWh by end of 2027, an additional 8% increase from current levels. This trajectory makes energy efficiency investments and solar panels increasingly attractive for homeowners in all rate tiers. Learn more about reducing your bills in our guide to ways to reduce your electricity bill.
Time-of-Use Rates: Beat the Grid with Timing
Many utilities now offer time-of-use (TOU) rate plans where the price per kWh varies by time of day and season. Understanding TOU rates can save 15–25% on your bill with zero capital investment — simply by shifting when you use energy.
California's standard TOU rates (SCE E-TOU-C) charge 57¢/kWh during peak hours (4–9 PM) and 28¢/kWh off-peak. A household that runs its dishwasher, EV charger, and laundry after 9 PM instead of at 6 PM can cut its effective rate by 30–40% in California. Texas's deregulated market allows even more aggressive TOU exploitation — some Griddy-type plans offer sub-2¢/kWh during overnight wind surplus periods.
The TOU strategy is particularly powerful if you own a battery storage system or an EV. Charge during cheap off-peak hours, discharge (or avoid drawing) during expensive peak hours. A Tesla Powerwall charged at 10¢/kWh off-peak and displacing 34¢/kWh peak consumption in California generates roughly $0.24/kWh in arbitrage value — enough to pay back a $16,000 battery installation in 8–10 years independent of solar. For full details on TOU arbitrage and battery sizing, see our Time-of-Use Rates Guide.
Before signing up for a TOU plan, run the math on your own bill. Pull 12 months of usage data from your utility (most offer an online portal), estimate what hours your major loads (HVAC, EV, water heater, laundry) run, and model whether the peak/off-peak spread saves you money or costs you more. A household that can't shift its load schedule (working from home with daytime AC, no EV to charge overnight) may actually do better on a flat-rate plan.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the average electricity rate in the US in 2026?
The national average residential electricity rate in early 2026 is approximately 18.05¢/kWh, up roughly 5.4% from 2025, according to EIA Electric Power Monthly data. That translates to about $163–$195/month for the average household consuming 899–1,080 kWh/month. Rates have risen over 30% since 2020, outpacing general inflation in most years.
Which state has the most expensive electricity in 2026?
Hawaii has the highest residential electricity rate at approximately 39.89¢/kWh in 2026, more than double the national average, per EIA data. The reason is Hawaii's near-total dependence on imported petroleum for electricity generation and geographic isolation from the continental grid. Massachusetts (around 31.51¢/kWh) and Rhode Island (around 31.30¢/kWh) rank second and third most expensive.
Which states have the cheapest electricity rates?
North Dakota has the lowest residential electricity rate at roughly 10.92¢/kWh in 2026, per EIA data. Louisiana (12.44¢/kWh), Wyoming, Idaho, and Washington also rank among the cheapest states. These states benefit from abundant hydroelectric power, coal, natural gas, or wind resources with minimal transmission costs and less aggressive renewable transition mandates.
Why do electricity rates vary so much between states?
Five factors drive rate variation: (1) fuel mix — hydropower states like Washington pay less than oil-dependent Hawaii; (2) grid infrastructure costs — rural states with long transmission lines pay more per kWh; (3) regulatory environment — deregulated markets sometimes compete rates down; (4) renewable mandates — states with aggressive RPS standards pay more short-term; (5) weather extremes that require expensive grid hardening investments.
Does my electricity rate affect whether solar panels are worth buying?
Your electricity rate is arguably the single biggest factor in solar ROI. At 30¢/kWh (Massachusetts, Connecticut), a typical 8 kW solar system pays back in 5–7 years and generates $80,000–$100,000 in 25-year savings. At 11¢/kWh (North Dakota, Louisiana), the same system takes 15–20 years to pay back. Most solar analysts consider solar financially compelling only above 14–15¢/kWh without incentives.
How can I find out my actual electricity rate?
The most accurate method is to divide your total monthly electricity charge (in dollars) by your total kWh consumed, both found on your utility bill. This gives your effective blended rate including all fees, taxes, and demand charges. Many homeowners are surprised to find their actual rate is 20–35% higher than their utility's advertised base rate once fixed charges and tiers are included.
Are electricity rates going to keep rising?
EIA's Short-Term Energy Outlook projects continued residential rate increases through at least 2027, driven by grid modernization investment, data center electricity demand (forecast to double by 2030 per Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory), EV charging infrastructure buildout, and ongoing natural gas price volatility. States without significant renewable resources or those with aging grid infrastructure face the steepest projected increases.
Calculate Your Actual Electricity Cost
Your state's average rate is a starting point — your actual effective rate, which includes all fees and taxes, may be higher. Enter your last bill details to find out exactly what you pay per kWh and what that means for solar, efficiency upgrades, and EV charging.
Use the Electricity Cost Calculator